You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Hierarchical Face: Higher Rankings Lead to Less Cooperative Looks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1037/a0026308 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patricia Chen, Christopher G. Myers, Shirli Kopelman, Stephen M. Garcia |
| Abstract |
In 3 studies, we tested the hypothesis that the higher ranked an individual's group is, the less cooperative the facial expression of that person is judged to be. Study 1 established this effect among business school deans, with observers rating individuals from higher ranked schools as appearing less cooperative, despite lacking prior knowledge of the latters' actual rankings. Study 2 then experimentally manipulated ranking, showing that the effect of rankings on facial expressions is driven by context rather than by individual differences per se. Finally, Study 3 demonstrated that the repercussions of this effect extend beyond the perception of cooperativeness to tangible behavioral outcomes in social interactions. Theoretical and practical implications of this phenomenon are discussed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 33% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 43% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 22 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,655,934
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#765
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,266
of 250,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#16
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.