↓ Skip to main content

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011890
Authors

Mark J Catley, William Gibson, Benedict M Wand, Catherine Meads, Neil E O'Connell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Unspecified 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Other 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Unspecified 7 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Psychology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2016.
All research outputs
#9,676,736
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,874
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,357
of 289,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.