↓ Skip to main content

Exposure to Scientific Consensus Does Not Cause Psychological Reactance

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 297)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
70 tweeters
Title
Exposure to Scientific Consensus Does Not Cause Psychological Reactance
Published in
Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, May 2019
DOI 10.1080/17524032.2019.1617763
Authors

Sander van der Linden, Edward Maibach, Anthony Leiserowitz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#363,870
of 13,055,201 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture
#22
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,660
of 149,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,055,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them