↓ Skip to main content

Does orchestration in the Global Climate Action Agenda effectively prioritize and mobilize transnational climate adaptation action?

Overview of attention for article published in International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does orchestration in the Global Climate Action Agenda effectively prioritize and mobilize transnational climate adaptation action?
Published in
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10784-019-09444-9
Authors

Sander Chan, Wanja Amling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 27%
Environmental Science 10 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 31 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,864,113
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
#56
of 328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,663
of 365,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them