↓ Skip to main content

Uncertainty in biological monitoring: a framework for data collection and analysis to account for multiple sources of sampling bias

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uncertainty in biological monitoring: a framework for data collection and analysis to account for multiple sources of sampling bias
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, February 2016
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12542
Authors

Viviana Ruiz-Gutierrez, Mevin B. Hooten, Evan H. Campbell Grant

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Latvia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 141 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 27%
Researcher 41 26%
Student > Master 21 13%
Other 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 4%
Other 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 55%
Environmental Science 45 28%
Unspecified 14 9%
Mathematics 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 5 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#885,982
of 12,565,531 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#574
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,633
of 267,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#20
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,565,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.