↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative mild hypothermia for postoperative neurological deficits in intracranial aneurysm patients.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraoperative mild hypothermia for postoperative neurological deficits in intracranial aneurysm patients.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008445.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li LR, You C, Chaudhary B

Abstract

Rupture of an intracranial aneurysm causes aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, which is one of the most devastating clinical conditions. Clinically, it can be classified into five grades using the Hunt-Hess or World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) scale. Grades 4 and 5 predict poor prognosis and are called 'poor grade', while grade 1, 2, and 3 are known as 'good grade'. Disturbances of intracranial homeostasis and brain metabolism are known to play certain roles in the sequelae. Hypothermia has a long history of being used to reduce metabolism rate, thereby protecting organs in cases where metabolism is disturbed and potentially harmful.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 41 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Other 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 13%
Other 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 80%
Unspecified 3 7%
Psychology 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2012.
All research outputs
#3,109,191
of 4,505,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,365
of 7,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,743
of 79,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.