↓ Skip to main content

ZIKV Strains Differentially Affect Survival of Human Fetal Astrocytes versus Neurons and Traffic of ZIKV-Laden Endocytotic Compartments

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ZIKV Strains Differentially Affect Survival of Human Fetal Astrocytes versus Neurons and Traffic of ZIKV-Laden Endocytotic Compartments
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-44559-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jernej Jorgačevski, Miša Korva, Maja Potokar, Marjeta Lisjak, Tatjana Avšič-Županc, Robert Zorec

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 18 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 10%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 23 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,574,539
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#79,074
of 125,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,581
of 350,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,058
of 3,109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.