↓ Skip to main content

Chinese Society amid Mao's Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution: The Roots and Nature of the Tragedy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cold War Studies, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 172)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese Society amid Mao's Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution: The Roots and Nature of the Tragedy
Published in
Journal of Cold War Studies, May 2019
DOI 10.1162/jcws_c_00880
Authors

Sergey Radchenko, Joseph Torigian, Radoslav Yordanov, Frank Dikötter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,163,043
of 13,477,663 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cold War Studies
#27
of 172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,931
of 248,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cold War Studies
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,477,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.