You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of financial incentives and text message feedback to increase healthy food purchases in a grocery store cash back program: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-019-6936-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anjali Gopalan, Pamela A. Shaw, Raymond Lim, Jithen Paramanund, Deepak Patel, Jingsan Zhu, Kevin G. Volpp, Alison M. Buttenheim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Guinea | 1 | 6% |
| Italy | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 39 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,969,265
of 24,788,795 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,211
of 16,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,904
of 355,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#65
of 413 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,788,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 413 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.