↓ Skip to main content

Extinction of fish-shaped marine reptiles associated with reduced evolutionary rates and global environmental volatility

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
67 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
65 tweeters
facebook
12 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Extinction of fish-shaped marine reptiles associated with reduced evolutionary rates and global environmental volatility
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms10825
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valentin Fischer, Nathalie Bardet, Roger B. J. Benson, Maxim S. Arkhangelsky, Matt Friedman

Abstract

Despite their profound adaptations to the aquatic realm and their apparent success throughout the Triassic and the Jurassic, ichthyosaurs became extinct roughly 30 million years before the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Current hypotheses for this early demise involve relatively minor biotic events, but are at odds with recent understanding of the ichthyosaur fossil record. Here, we show that ichthyosaurs maintained high but diminishing richness and disparity throughout the Early Cretaceous. The last ichthyosaurs are characterized by reduced rates of origination and phenotypic evolution and their elevated extinction rates correlate with increased environmental volatility. In addition, we find that ichthyosaurs suffered from a profound Early Cenomanian extinction that reduced their ecological diversity, likely contributing to their final extinction at the end of the Cenomanian. Our results support a growing body of evidence revealing that global environmental change resulted in a major, temporally staggered turnover event that profoundly reorganized marine ecosystems during the Cenomanian.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 37 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 6 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 657. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,102
of 13,968,403 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#182
of 25,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#370
of 267,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#3
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,968,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.