↓ Skip to main content

Participation in local food projects is associated with better psychological well-being: evidence from the East of England

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participation in local food projects is associated with better psychological well-being: evidence from the East of England
Published in
Journal of Public Health, July 2019
DOI 10.1093/pubmed/fdz057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zareen Pervez Bharucha, Netta Weinstein, Dave Watson, Steffen Boehm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Psychology 6 12%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#650,173
of 25,394,081 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health
#132
of 3,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,860
of 361,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,081 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.