Title |
RIM15antagonistic pleiotropy is responsible for differences in fermentation and stress response kinetics in budding yeast
|
---|---|
Published in |
FEMS Yeast Research, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1093/femsyr/fow021 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eduardo I. Kessi-Pérez, Sebastián Araos, Verónica García, Francisco Salinas, Valentina Abarca, Luis F. Larrondo, Claudio Martínez, Francisco A. Cubillos |
Abstract |
Different natural yeast populations have faced dissimilar selective pressures due to the heterogeneous fermentation substrates available around the world; this increases the genetic and phenotypic diversity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this context, we expect prominent differences between isolates when exposed to a particular condition, such as wine or sake musts. To better comprehend the mechanisms underlying niche adaptation between two S. cerevisiae isolates obtained from wine and sake fermentation processes, we evaluated fermentative and fungicide resistance phenotypes and identify the molecular origin of such adaptive variation. Multiple regions were associated with fermentation rate under different nitrogen conditions and fungicide resistance, with a single QTL co-localising in all traits. Analysis around this region identified RIM15 as the causative locus driving fungicide sensitivity, together with efficient nitrogen utilisation and glycerol production in the wine strain. A null RIM15 variant confers a greater fermentation rate through the utilisation of available glucose instead of its storage. However this variant has a detrimental effect on fungicide resistance since complex sugars are not synthesized and transported into the membrane. Together, our results reveal the antagonist pleiotropic nature of a RIM15 null variant, positively affecting a series of fermentation related phenotypes, but apparently detrimental in the wild. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 19% |
Researcher | 8 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Energy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |