You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparing time series transcriptome data between plants using a network module finding algorithm
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0440-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jiyoung Lee, Lenwood S. Heath, Ruth Grene, Song Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Luxembourg | 1 | 13% |
Australia | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 25% |
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 43% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 19% |
Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,666,005
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#387
of 1,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,973
of 356,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#9
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.