You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative Subsequence Sets Analysis (CoSSA) is a robust approach to identify haplotype specific SNPs; mapping and pedigree analysis of a potato wart disease resistance gene Sen3
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0445-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charlotte Prodhomme, Danny Esselink, Theo Borm, Richard G. F. Visser, Herman J. van Eck, Jack H. Vossen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 15% |
| Australia | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,656,309
of 24,736,359 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#196
of 1,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,291
of 355,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,736,359 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.