↓ Skip to main content

Forum 4: amphibious architecture beyond the levee

Overview of attention for article published in Mobilities, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 298)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
Title
Forum 4: amphibious architecture beyond the levee
Published in
Mobilities, June 2019
DOI 10.1080/17450101.2019.1596581
Authors

Stephanie Wakefield

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,598,870
of 13,073,633 outputs
Outputs from Mobilities
#36
of 298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,458
of 151,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mobilities
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,073,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them