↓ Skip to main content

Gendering conversational humor in advertising: an evolutionary explanation of the effects of spontaneous versus canned humor

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Advertising, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Gendering conversational humor in advertising: an evolutionary explanation of the effects of spontaneous versus canned humor
Published in
International Journal of Advertising, May 2019
DOI 10.1080/02650487.2019.1617544
Authors

Lachezar Ivanov, Martin Eisend, Tomas Bayon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 40%
Linguistics 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,571,231
of 14,033,149 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Advertising
#75
of 148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,703
of 257,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Advertising
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,033,149 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.