↓ Skip to main content

Antiseptics and microcosm biofilm formation on titanium surfaces

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Oral Research, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antiseptics and microcosm biofilm formation on titanium surfaces
Published in
Brazilian Oral Research, January 2016
DOI 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2016.vol30.0030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verardi, Georgia, Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio, Maske, Tamires Timm, Webber, Bruna, Santos, Luciana Ruschel dos, Santos, Luciana Ruschel Dos

Abstract

Oral rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants is a way to restore esthetics and masticatory function in edentulous patients, but bacterial colonization around the implants may lead to mucositis or peri-implantitis and consequent implant loss. Peri-implantitis is the main complication of oral rehabilitation with dental implants and, therefore, it is necessary to take into account the potential effects of antiseptics such as chlorhexidine (CHX), chloramine T (CHT), triclosan (TRI), and essential oils (EO) on bacterial adhesion and on biofilm formation. To assess the action of these substances, we used the microcosm technique, in which the oral environment and periodontal conditions are simulated in vitro on titanium discs with different surface treatments (smooth surface - SS, acid-etched smooth surface - AESS, sand-blasted surface - SBS, and sand-blasted and acid-etched surface - SBAES). Roughness measurements yielded the following results: SS: 0.47 µm, AESS: 0.43 µm, SB: 0.79 µm, and SBAES: 0.72 µm. There was statistical difference only between SBS and AESS. There was no statistical difference among antiseptic treatments. However, EO and CHT showed lower bacterial counts compared with the saline solution treatment (control group). Thus, the current gold standard (CHX) did not outperform CHT and EO, which were efficient in reducing the biofilm biomass compared with saline solution.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Materials Science 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 27%