↓ Skip to main content

Frantz Fanon and the CIA Man

Overview of attention for article published in American Historical Review, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,998)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
288 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
6 Redditors
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Frantz Fanon and the CIA Man
Published in
American Historical Review, June 2019
DOI 10.1093/ahr/rhz254
Authors

Thomas Meaney

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 288 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 227. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#54,206
of 13,232,368 outputs
Outputs from American Historical Review
#3
of 1,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,592
of 224,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Historical Review
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,232,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,998 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.