↓ Skip to main content

The content validity of the ANMS GCSI-DD in patients with idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 110)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The content validity of the ANMS GCSI-DD in patients with idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41687-018-0081-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dennis A. Revicki, Sara Lavoie, Rebecca M. Speck, Jorge Puelles, Braden Kuo, Michael Camilleri, Cristina Almansa, Henry P. Parkman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,788,816
of 13,583,919 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#23
of 110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,829
of 251,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,583,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,567 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them