↓ Skip to main content

Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010455.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lise M Verhoef, Bart JF van den Bemt, Aatke van der Maas, Johanna E Vriezekolk, Marlies E Hulscher, Frank HJ van den Hoogen, Wilco CH Jacobs, Noortje van Herwaarden, Alfons A den Broeder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Unspecified 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 6 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 52%
Unspecified 6 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#642,254
of 13,647,931 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,028
of 10,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,384
of 251,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,647,931 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.