↓ Skip to main content

Tiananmen Square, Leipzig, and the "Chinese Solution": Revisiting the Wende from an Asian-German Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in German Studies Review, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tiananmen Square, Leipzig, and the "Chinese Solution": Revisiting the Wende from an Asian-German Perspective
Published in
German Studies Review, January 2019
DOI 10.1353/gsr.2019.0005
Authors

Qinna Shen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#12,070,510
of 15,175,259 outputs
Outputs from German Studies Review
#100
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,648
of 264,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from German Studies Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,175,259 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them