↓ Skip to main content

Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
54 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Good Practice for Conference Abstracts and Presentations: GPCAP
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41073-019-0070-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cate Foster, Elizabeth Wager, Jackie Marchington, Mina Patel, Steve Banner, Nina C. Kennard, Antonia Panayi, Rianne Stacey

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#338,619
of 13,607,168 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#17
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,839
of 251,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,607,168 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them