↓ Skip to main content

Fetal exposure to bisphenol A as a risk factor for the development of childhood asthma: an animal model study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fetal exposure to bisphenol A as a risk factor for the development of childhood asthma: an animal model study
Published in
Environmental Health, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-11-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoichi Nakajima, Randall M Goldblum, Terumi Midoro-Horiuti

Abstract

The prevalence of asthma in industrialized countries has been increasing dramatically and asthma is now the most common chronic disease of children in the United States. The rapidity of the increase strongly suggests that changes in environmental exposures are the likely cause of this epidemic. Further, the early onset of allergic manifestations suggests that these exposures may act on the prenatal development of the immune system. We have focused on the potential effects of bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical pollutant with one of the largest productions, on the development of childhood asthma. We have reported that perinatal BPA exposure promotes the development of allergic asthma in a mouse model. The current study was designed to identify a critical period of BPA exposure and to begin elucidating the mechanisms for this susceptibility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 97 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 16 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Environmental Science 8 8%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,583,045
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#804
of 1,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,465
of 169,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.