↓ Skip to main content

The Canadian Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome (CHILDNEPH) Project: overview of design and methods

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Canadian Childhood Nephrotic Syndrome (CHILDNEPH) Project: overview of design and methods
Published in
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/2054-3581-1-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Samuel, Shannon Scott, Catherine Morgan, Allison Dart, Cherry Mammen, Rulan Parekh, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Allison Eddy, Rachel Flynn, Maury Pinsk, Andrew Wade, Steven Arora, Geneviève Benoit, Martin Bitzan, Robin Erickson, Janusz Feber, Guido Filler, Pavel Geier, Colette Girardin, Silviu Grisaru, James Tee, Kyle Kemp, Michael Zappitelli

Abstract

Nephrotic syndrome is a commonly acquired kidney disease in children that causes significant morbidity due to recurrent episodes of heavy proteinuria. The management of childhood nephrotic syndrome is known to be highly variable among physicians and care centres. The primary objective of the study is to determine centre-, physician-, and patient-level characteristics associated with steroid exposure and length of steroid treatment. We will also determine the association of dose and duration of steroid treatment and time to first relapse as a secondary aim. An embedded qualitative study utilizing focus groups with health care providers will enrich the quantitative results by providing an understanding of the attitudes, beliefs and local contextual factors driving variation in care. Mixed-methods study; prospective observational cohort (quantitative component), with additional semi-structured focus groups of healthcare professionals (qualitative component). National study, comprised of all 13 Canadian pediatric nephrology clinics. 400 patients under 18 years of age to be recruited over 2.5 years. Steroid doses for all episodes (first presentation, first and subsequent relapses) tracked over course of the study. Physician and centre-level characteristics catalogued, with reasons for treatment preferences documented during focus groups. All patients tracked prospectively over the course of the study, with data comprising a prospective registry. One focus group at each site to enrich understanding of variation in care. Contamination of treatment protocols between physicians may occur as a result of concurrent focus groups. Quantitative and qualitative results will be integrated at end of study and will collectively inform strategies for the development and implementation of standardized evidence-based protocols across centres.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 7 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,054,216
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#63
of 620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,488
of 239,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them