↓ Skip to main content

Aggregating the conceptualization of movement data better captures real world and simulated animal–environment relationships

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Geographical Information Science, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 433)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
Title
Aggregating the conceptualization of movement data better captures real world and simulated animal–environment relationships
Published in
International Journal of Geographical Information Science, May 2019
DOI 10.1080/13658816.2019.1618464
Authors

Paul Holloway

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,972,238
of 13,210,706 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Geographical Information Science
#47
of 433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,678
of 215,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Geographical Information Science
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,210,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.