You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Changing oral vaccine to inactivated polio vaccine might increase mortality
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00661-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eleanor N Fish, Kate L Flanagan, David Furman, Sabra L Klein, Tobias R Kollmann, Dorthe L Jeppesen, Ofer Levy, Arnaud Marchant, Siva Namachivayam, Mihai G Netea, Magdalena Plebanski, Sarah L Rowland-Jones, Liisa K Selin, Frank Shann, Hilton C Whittle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Denmark | 2 | 6% |
Malawi | 1 | 3% |
Finland | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
China | 1 | 3% |
Austria | 1 | 3% |
Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 68% |
Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 32% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,442,251
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#10,095
of 43,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,266
of 313,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#173
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.