↓ Skip to main content

Intra-uterine insemination versus timed intercourse or expectant management for cervical hostility in subfertile couples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intra-uterine insemination versus timed intercourse or expectant management for cervical hostility in subfertile couples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002809.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frans M Helmerhorst, Huib AAM Van Vliet, Twina Gornas, M J Finken, David A Grimes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#10,251,563
of 19,049,821 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,148
of 11,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,019
of 279,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,049,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.