↓ Skip to main content

Intra-uterine insemination versus timed intercourse or expectant management for cervical hostility in subfertile couples

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intra-uterine insemination versus timed intercourse or expectant management for cervical hostility in subfertile couples
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002809.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frans M Helmerhorst, Huib AAM Van Vliet, Twina Gornas, M J Finken, David A Grimes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 25%
Student > Master 6 17%
Other 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,423,880
of 14,212,940 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,201
of 10,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,746
of 259,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,212,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.