↓ Skip to main content

The effect of walking on falls in older people: the 'Easy Steps to Health' randomized controlled trial study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of walking on falls in older people: the 'Easy Steps to Health' randomized controlled trial study protocol
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Voukelatos, Dafna Merom, Chris Rissel, Cathie Sherrington, Wendy Watson, Karen Waller

Abstract

Falls in older people continue to be a major public health issue in industrialized countries. Extensive research into falls prevention has identified exercise as a proven fall prevention strategy. However, despite over a decade of promoting physical activity, hospitalisation rates due to falls injuries in older people are still increasing. This could be because efforts to increase physical activity amongst older people have been unsuccessful, or the physical activity that older people engage in is insufficient and/or inappropriate. The majority of older people choose walking as their predominant form of exercise. While walking has been shown to lower the risk of many chronic diseases its role in falls prevention remains unclear. This paper outlines the methodology of a study whose aims are to determine: if a home-based walking intervention will reduce the falls rate among healthy but inactive community-dwelling older adults (65 + years) compared to no intervention (usual activity) and; whether such an intervention can improve risk factors for falls, such as balance, strength and reaction time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 226 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Researcher 22 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 58 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 16%
Sports and Recreations 27 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 73 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,605,706
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,047
of 15,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,123
of 241,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#95
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.