You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Mapping 3D fault geometry in earthquakes using high‐resolution topography: Examples from the 2010 El Mayor‐Cucapah (Mexico) and 2013 Balochistan (Pakistan) earthquakes
Geophysical Research Letters, April 2016
Yu Zhou, Richard T. Walker, John R. Elliott, Barry Parsons
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||10||20%|
|Student > Master||8||16%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||5||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||34||69%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
of 19,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 300,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.