↓ Skip to main content

Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity

Overview of attention for article published in Science Advances, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
58 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
292 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
484 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
583 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity
Published in
Science Advances, March 2016
DOI 10.1126/sciadv.1500779
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yury Kryvasheyeu, Haohui Chen, Nick Obradovich, Esteban Moro, Pascal Van Hentenryck, James Fowler, Manuel Cebrian

Abstract

Could social media data aid in disaster response and damage assessment? Countries face both an increasing frequency and an increasing intensity of natural disasters resulting from climate change. During such events, citizens turn to social media platforms for disaster-related communication and information. Social media improves situational awareness, facilitates dissemination of emergency information, enables early warning systems, and helps coordinate relief efforts. In addition, the spatiotemporal distribution of disaster-related messages helps with the real-time monitoring and assessment of the disaster itself. We present a multiscale analysis of Twitter activity before, during, and after Hurricane Sandy. We examine the online response of 50 metropolitan areas of the United States and find a strong relationship between proximity to Sandy's path and hurricane-related social media activity. We show that real and perceived threats, together with physical disaster effects, are directly observable through the intensity and composition of Twitter's message stream. We demonstrate that per-capita Twitter activity strongly correlates with the per-capita economic damage inflicted by the hurricane. We verify our findings for a wide range of disasters and suggest that massive online social networks can be used for rapid assessment of damage caused by a large-scale disaster.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 292 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 583 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 563 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 22%
Student > Master 92 16%
Researcher 71 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Student > Postgraduate 27 5%
Other 96 16%
Unknown 139 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 85 15%
Social Sciences 69 12%
Engineering 64 11%
Environmental Science 36 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 33 6%
Other 119 20%
Unknown 177 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 700. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#30,092
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#419
of 12,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#495
of 315,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#6
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.