↓ Skip to main content

The role of primary care providers in patient activation and engagement in self-management: a cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of primary care providers in patient activation and engagement in self-management: a cross-sectional analysis
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12913-016-1328-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Alvarez, Jessica Greene, Judith Hibbard, Valerie Overton

Abstract

The increasing burden of chronic illness highlights the importance of self-care and shifts from hierarchical and patriarchal models to partnerships. Primary care providers (PCPs) play an important role in supporting patients in self-management, enabling activation and supporting chronic care. We explored the extent to which PCPs' beliefs about the importance of the patients' role relate to the frequency in which they report engaging in collaborative and partnership-building behaviors with patients. PCPs' beliefs were measured using the Clinician Support for Patient Activation Measure (CS-PAM). We also assessed whether PCPs' CS-PAM scores were positively associated with changes in their patients' Patient Activation Measure (PAM) scores. Participants included 181 PCPs from a single accountable care organization in Minnesota who completed an online survey. We conducted bivariate analyses and multivariate regression models to examine relationships between CS-PAM and PCP self-management support behaviors and changes in level of patient activation. PCPs with high CS-PAM scores were much more likely to engage in supportive self-management and patient behavior change approaches, such as involving the patient in agenda-setting, problem-solving, and collaboratively setting behavioral goals, than were PCPs with low CS-PAM scores. More positive PCPs' belief in the patients' role in self-management was positively correlated with improvements in their patients' level of patient activation. More positive PCP beliefs about the patients' role in self-management was strongly related to PCP behaviors geared towards increasing patient activation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 19%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Other 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 23%
Social Sciences 15 11%
Psychology 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 30 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,033,433
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,352
of 7,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,050
of 301,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#19
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.