↓ Skip to main content

Targeting neurotransmitter receptors with nanoparticles in vivo allows single-molecule tracking in acute brain slices

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting neurotransmitter receptors with nanoparticles in vivo allows single-molecule tracking in acute brain slices
Published in
Nature Communications, March 2016
DOI 10.1038/ncomms10947
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan A. Varela, Julien P. Dupuis, Laetitia Etchepare, Agnès Espana, Laurent Cognet, Laurent Groc

Abstract

Single-molecule imaging has changed the way we understand many biological mechanisms, particularly in neurobiology, by shedding light on intricate molecular events down to the nanoscale. However, current single-molecule studies in neuroscience have been limited to cultured neurons or organotypic slices, leaving as an open question the existence of fast receptor diffusion in intact brain tissue. Here, for the first time, we targeted dopamine receptors in vivo with functionalized quantum dots and were able to perform single-molecule tracking in acute rat brain slices. We propose a novel delocalized and non-inflammatory way of delivering nanoparticles (NPs) in vivo to the brain, which allowed us to label and track genetically engineered surface dopamine receptors in neocortical neurons, revealing inherent behaviour and receptor activity regulations. We thus propose a NP-based platform for single-molecule studies in the living brain, opening new avenues of research in physiological and pathological animal models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 37 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 17%
Chemistry 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Engineering 11 7%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,807,427
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#48,188
of 57,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,974
of 314,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#695
of 871 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 871 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.