↓ Skip to main content

BAF complex vulnerabilities in cancer demonstrated via structure-based PROTAC design

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Chemical Biology, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
twitter
74 X users
patent
18 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
359 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
461 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BAF complex vulnerabilities in cancer demonstrated via structure-based PROTAC design
Published in
Nature Chemical Biology, June 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41589-019-0294-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Farnaby, Manfred Koegl, Michael J. Roy, Claire Whitworth, Emelyne Diers, Nicole Trainor, David Zollman, Steffen Steurer, Jale Karolyi-Oezguer, Carina Riedmueller, Teresa Gmaschitz, Johannes Wachter, Christian Dank, Michael Galant, Bernadette Sharps, Klaus Rumpel, Elisabeth Traxler, Thomas Gerstberger, Renate Schnitzer, Oliver Petermann, Peter Greb, Harald Weinstabl, Gerd Bader, Andreas Zoephel, Alexander Weiss-Puxbaum, Katharina Ehrenhöfer-Wölfer, Simon Wöhrle, Guido Boehmelt, Joerg Rinnenthal, Heribert Arnhof, Nicola Wiechens, Meng-Ying Wu, Tom Owen-Hughes, Peter Ettmayer, Mark Pearson, Darryl B. McConnell, Alessio Ciulli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 461 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 18%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Student > Master 39 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 4%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 146 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 124 27%
Chemistry 115 25%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 2%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 151 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 141. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#302,115
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Nature Chemical Biology
#108
of 3,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,100
of 370,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Chemical Biology
#2
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.