You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Framework for Assessing Impacts of Wild Meat Hunting Practices in the Tropics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Ecology, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10745-019-0075-6 |
| Authors |
Andy D. M. Dobson, E. J. Milner-Gulland, Daniel J. Ingram, Aidan Keane |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 39% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,322,807
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#154
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,371
of 355,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.