↓ Skip to main content

Microbial levan and pullulan as potential protective agents for reducing adverse effects of copper on Daphnia magna and Vibrio fischeri

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microbial levan and pullulan as potential protective agents for reducing adverse effects of copper on Daphnia magna and Vibrio fischeri
Published in
Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Branka Lončarević, Marija Lješević, Marijana Marković, Ivan Anđelković, Gordana Gojgić-Cvijović, Dragica Jakovljević, Vladimir Beškoski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Unspecified 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,643,030
of 15,248,235 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety
#1,816
of 4,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,598
of 266,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety
#69
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,248,235 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,784 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.