You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and initial testing of a Health Confidence Score (HCS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open Quality, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000411 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Benson, Henry W W Potts, Pippa Bark, Clive Bowman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 60% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 60% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,298,457
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Quality
#115
of 743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,503
of 353,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Quality
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.