You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Palaeoproteomics resolves sloth relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41559-019-0909-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha Presslee, Graham J. Slater, François Pujos, Analía M. Forasiepi, Roman Fischer, Kelly Molloy, Meaghan Mackie, Jesper V. Olsen, Alejandro Kramarz, Matías Taglioretti, Fernando Scaglia, Maximiliano Lezcano, José Luis Lanata, John Southon, Robert Feranec, Jonathan Bloch, Adam Hajduk, Fabiana M. Martin, Rodolfo Salas Gismondi, Marcelo Reguero, Christian de Muizon, Alex Greenwood, Brian T. Chait, Kirsty Penkman, Matthew Collins, Ross D. E. MacPhee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 14 | 10% |
| United States | 11 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 7% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Thailand | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 81 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 108 | 78% |
| Scientists | 27 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 117 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 19 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#181,265
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#360
of 2,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,489
of 368,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Ecology & Evolution
#11
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 149.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.