↓ Skip to main content

Tarangire revisited: Consequences of declining connectivity in a tropical ungulate population

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tarangire revisited: Consequences of declining connectivity in a tropical ungulate population
Published in
Biological Conservation, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.034
Authors

Thomas A. Morrison, William A. Link, William D. Newmark, Charles A.H. Foley, Douglas T. Bolger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
India 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 51%
Environmental Science 12 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2016.
All research outputs
#401,200
of 12,238,739 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#328
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,661
of 282,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#11
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,238,739 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.