↓ Skip to main content

Raison de l’Hégémonie (The Hegemon’s Interest): Theory of the Costs and Benefits of Hegemony

Overview of attention for article published in Security Studies, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Raison de l’Hégémonie (The Hegemon’s Interest): Theory of the Costs and Benefits of Hegemony
Published in
Security Studies, June 2019
DOI 10.1080/09636412.2019.1604982
Authors

Carla Norrlof, William C. Wohlforth

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,967,433
of 13,226,239 outputs
Outputs from Security Studies
#213
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,607
of 214,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Security Studies
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,226,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.