You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proximity to unconventional shale gas infrastructure alters breeding bird abundance and distribution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ornithological Applications, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/condor/duz020 |
| Authors |
Laura S. Farwell, Petra B. Wood, Donald J. Brown, James Sheehan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Poland | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,161,657
of 24,837,507 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#130
of 2,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,851
of 359,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.