↓ Skip to main content

The Persuasive Effect of Journalistic Storytelling: Experiments on the Portrayal of Exemplars in the News

Overview of attention for article published in Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Persuasive Effect of Journalistic Storytelling: Experiments on the Portrayal of Exemplars in the News
Published in
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, June 2019
DOI 10.1177/1077699019850096
Authors

Corinna Oschatz, Katharina Emde-Lachmund, Christoph Klimmt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,383,451
of 13,226,239 outputs
Outputs from Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
#110
of 621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,465
of 214,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,226,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.