↓ Skip to main content

Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, October 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.457
Authors

Steven R. Corsi, Laura A. De Cicco, Daniel L. Villeneuve, Brett R. Blackwell, Kellie A. Fay, Gerald T. Ankley, Austin K. Baldwin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 50%
Environmental Science 3 30%
Chemistry 1 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,094,824
of 13,505,887 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#2,513
of 10,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,969
of 249,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#139
of 522 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,505,887 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 522 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.