You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diatomite derived hierarchical hybrid anode for high performance all-solid-state lithium metal batteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-10473-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fei Zhou, Zheng Li, Yu-Yang Lu, Bao Shen, Yong Guan, Xiu-Xia Wang, Yi-Chen Yin, Bai-Sheng Zhu, Lei-Lei Lu, Yong Ni, Yi Cui, Hong-Bin Yao, Shu-Hong Yu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 14 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 7 | 9% |
| Energy | 6 | 8% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,254,879
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#31,733
of 47,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,196
of 352,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#927
of 1,353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 47,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.