You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Origins of Peter’s Pence
|
---|---|
Published in |
English Historical Review, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1093/ehr/cez070 |
Authors |
Rory Naismith, Francesca Tinti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 14 | 35% |
Spain | 2 | 5% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
Mauritius | 1 | 3% |
Comoros | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Georgia | 1 | 3% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 63% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 18% |
Scientists | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,357,710
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from English Historical Review
#28
of 3,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,381
of 369,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from English Historical Review
#1
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,064 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.