You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognition, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nick Byrd, Paul Conway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 35% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,240,903
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cognition
#371
of 3,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,264
of 362,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition
#6
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.