The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cognition, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.007 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nick Byrd, Paul Conway |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 36% |
Brazil | 2 | 9% |
Germany | 1 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 5% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
Scientists | 6 | 27% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 14 | 21% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
Philosophy | 3 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 30 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,311,298
of 26,337,162 outputs
Outputs from Cognition
#386
of 3,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,087
of 363,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition
#6
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,337,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.