You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
The use of technology in the context of frailty screening and management interventions: a study of stakeholders’ perspectives
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2019
Holly Gwyther, Lex van Velsen, Rachel L. Shaw, Barbara D’Avanzo, Maria Bujnowska-Fedak, Donata Kurpas, Katarzyna Szwamel, Jan-Willem van’t Klooster, Carol Holland
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||6||67%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||11%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||19||22%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||8||9%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||4||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||13||15%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||13%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,666,107 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 354,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.