↓ Skip to main content

Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012392.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soo Downe, Kenneth Finlayson, Özge Tunçalp, Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 6 5%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 31 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 33 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#571,937
of 14,546,774 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,647
of 11,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,262
of 262,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,546,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.