↓ Skip to main content

Deans of Women and the Feminist Movement: Emily Taylor’s Activism. By Kelly C. Sartorius

Overview of attention for article published in Oral History Review, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deans of Women and the Feminist Movement: Emily Taylor’s Activism. By Kelly C. Sartorius
Published in
Oral History Review, December 2018
DOI 10.1093/ohr/ohy072
Authors

Joanne L Goodwin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#10,727,955
of 13,483,630 outputs
Outputs from Oral History Review
#169
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,895
of 249,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oral History Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,483,630 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them