↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative Twitter analysis of participants, tweet strategies, and tweet content at a major urologic conference

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Urological Association Journal, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Qualitative Twitter analysis of participants, tweet strategies, and tweet content at a major urologic conference
Published in
Canadian Urological Association Journal, February 2016
DOI 10.5489/cuaj.3322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hendrik Borgmann, Jan-Henning Woelm, Axel Merseburger, Tim Nestler, Johannes Salem, Maximilian P. Brandt, Axel Haferkamp, Stacy Loeb

Abstract

The microblogging social media platform Twitter is increasingly being adopted in the urologic field. We aimed to analyze participants, tweet strategies, and tweet content of the Twitter discussion at a urologic conference. A comprehensive analysis of the Twitter activity at the European Association of Urology Congress 2013 (#eau2013) was performed, including characteristics of user profiles, engagement and popularity measurements, characteristics and timing of tweets, and content analysis. Of 218 Twitter contributors, doctors (45%) were the most frequent, ahead of associations (15%), companies (10%), and journals (3%). However, journals had the highest tweet/participant rate (22 tweets/participant), profile activity (median: 1177, total tweets, 1805 followers, 979 following), and profile popularity (follower/following ratio: 2.1; retweet rank percentile: 96%). Links in a profile were associated with higher engagement (p<0.0001) and popularity (p<0.0001). Of 1572 tweets, 57% were original tweets, 71% contained mentions, 20% contained links, and 25% included pictures. The majority of tweets (88%) were during conference hours, with an average of 24.7 tweets/hour and a peak activity of 71 tweets/hour. Overall, 59% of tweets were informative, led by the topics uro-oncology (21%), urologic research (21%), and urotechnology (12%). Limitations include the analysis of a single conference analysis, assessment of global profile and not domain-specific activity, and the rapid evolution in Twitter-using habits. Results of this single conference qualitative analysis are promising for an enrichment of the scientific discussions at urologic conferences through the use of Twitter.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Unspecified 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Other 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Unspecified 9 18%
Computer Science 7 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Other 7 14%