↓ Skip to main content

Freeze-thaw durability of repair mortars and porous limestone: compatibility issues

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Freeze-thaw durability of repair mortars and porous limestone: compatibility issues
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40645-019-0282-1
Authors

Ákos Török, Balázs Szemerey-Kiss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Researcher 6 14%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 16 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Materials Science 4 10%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 21 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,575,425
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#360
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,337
of 353,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.